MATERIALS & METHODS

In this retrospective chart review, we reviewed our movement disorders database from 2016 to 2020 to identify those patients who had undergone CES as part of the evaluation of dystonia as their prominent phenotypic feature. Patient details were anonymized to maintain patient privacy. The clinical data, investigations and genetic reports of these patients were reviewed. All these patients were examined by movement disorder specialists PKP, RY, NK, VVH). Dystonia in each patient was classified according to the recent consensus update on the classification and phenomenology of dystonia [1]. Additionally, based on the associated neurological features, dystonia was classified as isolated dystonia (IsoD), combined dystonia (CombD) or complex dystonia (CxD). Patients with IsoD had dystonia as the predominant feature, whereas patients with CombD had dystonia with other movement disorders, such as myoclonus, chorea, or parkinsonism. Patients with CxD had other neurological or systemic features [11]. CES (Supplementary Materials 1 and 2 in the online-only Data Supplement) was performed in all these patients, and the report was analyzed. The Institute Ethics Committee at the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences granted an ethical clearance waiver owing to the retrospective nature of the study, with deidentified data being extracted from the files (No: NIMH/DO/DEAN [Basic Science]/2020-21). p value of < 0.05 considered statistically significant (Supplementary Material 1 in the online-only Data Supplement).

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (35 males) belonging to 46 families were identified (Table 1). None of these patients had undergone single-gene or targeted-gene testing prior to CES. A positive family history was noted in 7 patients, including in 2 patients each from 2 families and in one patient each from 3 families (5 total families). Three patients from our center whose cases were previously published (patient 5 [12], patient 12 [13], and patient 16 [14]) were included in this study. The demographic and clinical details and axis-1 classification details of this cohort are provided in Table 1.

Pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants were present in 20 patients (18 families) (Table 2). The genes in which the P/LP variants were observed were PLA2G6 (4 patients from 3 families); GLB1 (3 patients from 2 families); TH, PRKN, TOR1A, and GCH1 in 2 patients each (a total of 8 patients from 8 families); and THAP1, NDUFA12, NPC1, ATP7B, and FA2H in one patient each (a total of 5 patients from 5 families) (Table 2). Among these, 14 patients (from 13 families) had novel variants that were classified as P/LP based on American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) causality criteria (Table 2). The age at onset (AAO), distribution of dystonia, associated features, and genetic abnormality in each patient are mentioned in Table 2. Among patients with a positive genetic diagnosis, TOR1A causing DYT1 was the most common genetic abnormality among those with IsoD, seen in 2 out of 6 patients, while PLA2G6 causing PLA2G6-associated neurodegeneration (PLAN) was the most common genetic abnormality among those with CombD, observed in 4 out of 9 patients. In addition, 5 patients had P/LP variants in the heterozygous carrier state, and 8 patients had variants of unknown significance (VUSs) in genes relevant to dystonia (Supplementary Table 1 in the online-only Data Supplement).

When comparing patients with a positive genetic diagnosis to those with a negative genetic diagnosis, most of the patients with a positive genetic diagnosis had an early AAO of dystonia (≤ 20 yrs) (Table 1). Of an overall 36 patients with early-onset dystonia (≤ 20 years), 19 had P/LP mutations (52.8%). Among 12 patients with an adult onset of dystonia (> 20 years), only one had a P/LP mutation (8.3%) (p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic yield of genetic testing based on the distribution or the associated features.

DISCUSSION

In the present study, a cohort of 48 patients with heterogeneous dystonia who had undergone CES as part of their evaluation was analyzed. Our cohort had an early AAO of dystonia, with three-fourths of the patients having an AAO before 20 years. In comparison, earlier studies reported a relatively equal distribution of the AAO (Supplementary Table 2 in the online-only Data Supplement) [5,6,8-10]. Dystonia with an underlying genetic cause often has an early AAO and presentation. The yield of genetic testing in our cohort was higher (39.1%) than that in previous studies (11.7% to 37.5%) (Supplementary Table 2 in the online-only Data Supplement). This variability in diagnostic yield is most likely attributable to the inclusion criteria and possibly due to the differences in the population studied and the clinical characteristics of the enrolled patients. The higher yield seen in the present study may be due to the higher prevalence of young-onset dystonia and to selection bias. In previous studies, a higher yield of approximately 35% has been reported when the mean age of onset is in the 1st to 2nd decade [5,6,10]. The lower positive rate in some of these studies could be due to the inclusion of patients with negative results in the initial targeted gene testing of a single gene or a set of genes [6,9].

Even though genetic testing plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of an underlying genetic abnormality, it may not always be accessible or financially feasible. An awareness of the predictors for positive genetic testing would help in the judicious use of NGS. The comparison of patients with and without a positive genetic test revealed the importance of an AAO of ≤ 20 years. None of the remaining clinical features had any impact on the outcome of genetic testing. Previous studies have shown that patients with an early AAO CombD or CxD have a higher likelihood of having a positive genetic diagnosis. However, patients with a later AAO isolated or focal dystonia have a lower likelihood of a positive genetic diagnosis [6,9,10]. However, these findings are inconsistent. The lack of such associations in the present study despite the presence of patients with IsoD, CombD, and CxD may be due to a lower sample size or different genetic population makeup than in previous studies.

The spectrum of affected genes seen in the present study was different from that in previous studies (Supplementary Table 2 in the online-only Data Supplement) [3,5,6,8-10]. In the present study, PLA2G6 mutations were identified in 3 families (4 patients) with P/LP mutations (one novel mutation) and 2 families (2 patients) with VUSs. These patients presented with the typical dystonia-parkinsonism phenotypic subtype of PLAN. In another study from India [15], 3 patients had dystonia among 12 with genetically confirmed PLAN with a phenotype of neuronal axonal degeneration, suggesting that PLA2G6 mutations may not be an uncommon genetic cause in the Indian population. However, this may be restricted to the population studied, and larger studies are required to ascertain the prevalence of PLA2G6 mutations in patients with dystonia worldwide. DYT-TOR1A is considered to be the most common early-onset isolated genetic dystonia, which was the case in our study, and one-third of patients with IsoD had a previously reported pathogenic variant (p.Glu303del) in the TOR1A gene [9]. Previous studies from India vary in this regard. None of the patients among a cohort of 178 IsoD patients harbored the p.Glu303del variant in TOR1A [16], while in a different study, only two patients belonging to a single family in a cohort of 321 patients with IsoD harbored this mutation [17]. In the current study, a patient who presented with childhood-onset complex generalized dystonia was found to have an NDUFA12 gene mutation leading to Leigh’s syndrome. Although this is a known manifestation, it has not been described in previous studies of this nature. We did not observe any patients with ANO3, GNAL, or KMT2B mutations, which are among the recently described monogenic DYTs. This is consistent with previous reports with only a single patient with dystonia each due to GNAL [18] and KMT2B [19] mutations described thus far from India and none due to ANO3 mutations. The frequency of a particular genetic mutation depends on population studies, which also has to be kept in mind when designing targeted gene panels to suit the population being tested.

With the introduction of NGS, the number of variants identified has increased. We found VUSs in nearly as many patients as those who had a P/LP mutation. With advancements in genomics, the status of these VUSs will be clarified, which may further improve detection rates. However, one needs to be aware of the benefits and limitations of the tests being ordered. Although NGS is time-saving and cost effective, many VUSs can be detected, which need to be interpreted with caution to determine pathogenicity. Additionally, with WES and WGS, VUSs unrelated to the disease being evaluated may be detected, further compounding the difficulty in interpretation and adding to the psychological burden of patients owing to the presence of an additional unexpected abnormality. This possibility has to be discussed during pregenetic test counseling. Furthermore, a negative NGS result does not rule out a genetic disease, as NGS may miss copy number variants, large deletions and duplications, repeat disorders and diseases with imprinting phenomena. A genetic diagnosis has many clinical implications. Apart from identifying treatable disorders, an early genetic diagnosis will lead to proper prognostication, genetic counseling, family planning, and predicting the response to specific management options such as deep brain stimulation, which may have a differential response depending upon the genetic diagnosis [20].

Limitations

This study has several limitations owing to its retrospective nature. Not all patients with dystonia were offered or underwent genetic assessment. In addition, patients were not chosen consecutively or in any predefined manner, leading to a bias in ordering the genetic testing. The prevalence of patients with a younger AAO may be due to a clinical bias when ordering CES. It is likely that younger patients were advised CES more often in the hope of identifying a treatable cause. Biochemical estimations were not performed in patients with underlying enzyme defects, such as dopa-responsive dystonia, GM1 gangliosides, and Niemann-Pick disease type C. Segregation and functional studies could not be performed in several patients with VUSs to identify pathogenicity.

Conclusion

CES is a very useful tool in the evaluation of dystonia, with a yield of close to 40%. In particular, phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity preclude single-gene tests, as they are time-consuming and not cost effective. An early AAO of dystonia could suggest a higher probability of a genetic cause and needs to be considered when ordering genetic testing.

Supplementary Materials

Notes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

None

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Vikram Venkappayya Holla, Koti Neeraja, Albert Stezin, Pramod Kumar Pal. Data curation: Koti Neeraja, Vikram Venkappayya Holla, Albert Stezin, Shweta Prasad. Formal analysis: Vikram Venkappayya Holla, Koti Neeraja, Shweta Prasad. Investigation: Vikram Venkappayya Holla, Koti Neeraja, Bharat Kumar Surisetti. Methodology: Vikram Venkappayya Holla, Koti Neeraja, Pramod Kumar Pal. Project administration: Manjunath Netravathi, Nitish Kamble, Ravi Yadav, Pramod Kumar Pal. Resources: Vikram Venkappayya Holla, Manjunath Netravathi, Nitish Kamble, Ravi Yadav, Pramod Kumar Pal. Supervision: Vikram Venkappayya Holla, Ravi Yadav, Pramod Kumar Pal. Visualization: Vikram Venkappayya Holla, Pramod Kumar Pal. Writing—original draft: Vikram Venkappayya Holla, Koti Neeraja. Writing—review & editing: Albert Stezin, Shweta Prasad, Bharat Kumar Surisetti, Manjunath Netravathi, Nitish Kamble, Ravi Yadav, Pramod Kumar Pal.

REFERENCES

• 1. Albanese A, Bhatia K, Bressman SB, Delong MR, Fahn S, Fung VS, et al. Phenomenology and classification of dystonia: a consensus update. Mov Disord 2013;28:863–873.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 2. Fung VS, Jinnah HA, Bhatia K, Vidailhet M. Assessment of patients with isolated or combined dystonia: an update on dystonia syndromes. Mov Disord 2013;28:889–898.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 3. van Egmond ME, Lugtenberg CHA, Brouwer OF, Contarino MF, Fung VSC, Heiner-Fokkema MR, et al. A post hoc study on gene panel analysis for the diagnosis of dystonia. Mov Disord 2017;32:569–575.ArticlePubMed
• 4. Zech M, Gross N, Jochim A, Castrop F, Kaffe M, Dresel C, et al. Rare sequence variants in ANO3 and GNAL in a primary torsion dystonia series and controls. Mov Disord 2014;29:143–147.ArticlePubMed
• 5. Zech M, Boesch S, Jochim A, Weber S, Meindl T, Schormair B, et al. Clinical exome sequencing in early-onset generalized dystonia and large-scale resequencing follow-up. Mov Disord 2017;32:549–559.ArticlePubMed
• 6. Kumar KR, Davis RL, Tchan MC, Wali GM, Mahant N, Ng K, et al. Whole genome sequencing for the genetic diagnosis of heterogenous dystonia phenotypes. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2019;69:111–118.ArticlePubMed
• 7. Montaut S, Tranchant C, Drouot N, Rudolf G, Guissart C, Tarabeux J, et al. Assessment of a targeted gene panel for identification of genes associated with movement disorders. JAMA Neurol 2018;75:1234–1245.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 8. Ma J, Wang L, Yang YM, Wan XH. Targeted gene capture sequencing in diagnosis of dystonia patients. J Neurol Sci 2018;390:36–41.ArticlePubMed
• 9. Powis Z, Towne MC, Hagman KDF, Blanco K, Palmaer E, Castro A, et al. Clinical diagnostic exome sequencing in dystonia: genetic testing challenges for complex conditions. Clin Genet 2020;97:305–311.ArticlePubMed
• 10. Wirth T, Tranchant C, Drouot N, Keren B, Mignot C, Cif L, et al. Increased diagnostic yield in complex dystonia through exome sequencing. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2020;74:50–56.ArticlePubMed
• 11. Marras C, Lang A, van de Warrenburg BP, Sue CM, Tabrizi SJ, Bertram L, et al. Nomenclature of genetic movement disorders: recommendations of the international Parkinson and movement disorder society task force. Mov Disord 2016;31:436–457.ArticlePubMed
• 12. Prasad S, Sahoo L, Saini J, Pal P. Wishbone pattern of iron accumulation: a pathognomonic sign of type III GM1 gangliosidosis. Ann Mov Disord 2019;2:134.Article
• 13. Chaithra SP, Stezin A, Prasad S, Holla VV, Lenka A, Kamble N, et al. A case of late-onset dopa-responsive isolated dystonia secondary to a novel tyrosine hydroxylase gene variant. Clin Park Relat Disord 2020;3:100039.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 14. Holla VV, Prasad S, Neeraja K, Kamble N, Yadav R, Pal PK. Late adulthood onset DYT-THAP1 secondary to a novel splice site mutation-A report from India. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2020;78:36–37.ArticlePubMed
• 15. Kapoor S, Shah MH, Singh N, Rather MI, Bhat V, Gopinath S, et al. Genetic analysis of PLA2G6 in 22 Indian families with infantile neuroaxonal dystrophy, atypical late-onset neuroaxonal dystrophy and dystonia parkinsonism complex. PLoS One 2016;11:e0155605. ArticlePubMedPMC
• 16. Naiya T, Biswas A, Neogi R, Datta S, Misra AK, Das SK, et al. Clinical characterization and evaluation of DYT1 gene in Indian primary dystonia patients. Acta Neurol Scand 2006;114:210–215.ArticlePubMed
• 17. Giri S, Biswas A, Das SK, Ray K, Ray J. Molecular basis of DYT1 and DYT6 primary dystonia in Indian patients. Mol Cytogenet 2014;7:P121.ArticlePMC
• 18. Pandey S, Sankhla CS, Ramprasad VL, Geetha TS. Novel GNAL mutation in an Indian patient with generalized dystonia and response to deep brain stimulation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2019;62:246–247.ArticlePubMed
• 19. Pandey S, Bhattad S, Panda AK, Mahadevan L. Late-onset KMT2B-related dystonia in an Indian patient with normal cognition, dystonic opisthotonus and lack of oromandibular and laryngeal involvement. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2020;74:33–35.ArticlePubMed
• 20. Artusi CA, Dwivedi A, Romagnolo A, Bortolani S, Marsili L, Imbalzano G, et al. Differential response to pallidal deep brain stimulation among monogenic dystonias: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020;91:426–433.ArticlePubMed

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Dissecting genetic architecture of rare dystonia: genetic, molecular and clinical insights
  Burcu Atasu, Javier Simón-Sánchez, Hasmet Hanagasi, Basar Bilgic, Ann-Kathrin Hauser, Gamze Guven, Peter Heutink, Thomas Gasser, Ebba Lohmann
  Journal of Medical Genetics.2024; : jmg-2022-109099.     CrossRef
• Whole exome sequencing and clinical investigation of young onset dystonia: What can we learn?
  Jong Hyeon Ahn, Ah Reum Kim, Woong-Yang Park, Jin Whan Cho, Jongkyu Park, Jinyoung Youn
  Parkinsonism & Related Disorders.2023; 115: 105814.     CrossRef

Comments on this article